Global Equity Tax
Depending on where its holder worked and which sub-plan existed, one option grant can be taxed as salary in France at exercise, partly in the UK for the years spent in London, or only at sale, and the US plan document decides none of that on its own. Many of the conditions behind each outcome are set at grant, and few can be repaired once the option has been exercised.


Picture this: a firmware engineer in Lyon writes to the head of people at the Seattle robotics company that employs her through its French subsidiary, asking why options she exercised last autumn, and has not sold, are being taxed as salary on this year's return. The grant came off the US plan used for Seattle staff, but nobody checked whether that plan met the conditions for French-qualified options that could have deferred the charge until sale, and French payroll never saw the exercise, because the notice stopped with the US plan administrator.
The general answer to how stock options are taxed for international employees is that the gain is normally treated as employment income, at a moment local law chooses (often exercise), by the countries where the work that earned it was performed and sometimes where the holder lives. Regimes such as UK EMI or French qualified plans can move the charge to sale, but only when the company and the employee both qualify. The sections below cover the factors, six countries, withholding, relocation, worked examples and risky decisions.
Two legal questions come before any tax one - whether a securities exemption covers the employee offer and whether exchange controls let residents hold the parent's shares. Once the grant is possible, four factors decide how a given option is taxed.
An option passes through four dates that can each carry tax, and which one does depends on the instrument, the country, any favorable regime and where the holder lives and works.
Under HMRC guidance, there is usually no UK income tax charge at grant, and under IRS rules, a US option produces no income at grant without a readily determinable value, which employee options rarely have. Australia's employee share scheme rules differ, generally taxing the discount in the acquisition year unless deferral conditions are met.
Under an Australian deferral, the charge can fall at vesting where the option is free of forfeiture risk and disposal restrictions, although for a typical non-transferable option it often moves to exercise. A US NSO exercised before vesting generally produces income when the shares vest, unless an 83(b) election, available for early-exercised shares but not a plain option grant, brings it forward.
The spread is generally taxed at exercise on US NSOs and on UK unapproved, German, Indian and French non-qualified options, and in Canada, where a deduction of half the benefit can apply. US ISOs produce no regular income at exercise, although the spread counts toward alternative minimum tax.
Growth after exercise is generally a capital gain at sale, with the US basis including income already taxed at exercise, an amount the employee may need to add when Form 1099-B reports a lower basis. In France, qualified options and BSPCE move the acquisition gain itself into the year of sale.
The six countries below show how far one instrument's treatment can move, with each row's legal conditions first.
Withholding follows from the tax event and the employment relationship, so the issues below turn on who runs payroll and what the exercise is worth locally.
An employee's US NSO exercise is wages subject to income tax withholding and FICA, while IRS Publication 5992 excludes an ISO exercise from those employment taxes. In the UK, unapproved options over readily convertible assets go through PAYE and a qualifying EMI exercise generally does not, while German and Indian payrolls typically withhold on the exercise gain.
The duty often sits with whoever runs payroll in the taxing country, so the US parent holds it mainly when it is the employer itself. A parent paying a US citizen abroad can stop withholding, under IRS Publication 54, where the foreign earned income exclusion is reasonably expected to apply. Where a foreign employer has no UK presence, HMRC's PAYE manual can treat the UK entity the person works for as the payer.
An employer of record can change eligibility before it changes withholding, since EMI is limited to employees of the issuing company or a qualifying subsidiary, and ISOs need employment within the granting company's group. The EOR can only withhold on an exercise it hears about, and India's route, for example, depends on employment by the Indian entity that reports to the RBI, so the effects are not automatic and turn on the country and the contract.
A move between countries does not reset an award, because many countries divide the gain by where the work that earned it was performed.
Under US regulation, option pay is generally sourced over the period from grant to vesting, measured in US workdays, and HMRC and the OECD Commentary take a similar approach.
HMRC can keep taxing the share of a gain earned by UK workdays after the holder leaves, and the US taxes citizens wherever they live, relieving the overlap mainly through the foreign tax credit. The OECD notes that allocation alone may not prevent double taxation when residence changes between grant and sale, so one exercise can leave two payrolls with a duty and treaty relief to work out.
NASPP lists the data required, including tax residency, work location, employing entity, mobility dates and worker classification changes. HR owns the dates, Finance owns each country's payroll instruction at exercise, and Legal owns whether the award still qualifies, given tests such as EMI's working-time rule and the possible end of a Section 19a deferral when employment ends.
The illustrative figures below show which country taxes which part of each gain.
A US citizen holds NSOs over 8,000 shares at a $5.00 strike, vesting over four years to March 1, 2026, spends two of those years in the US and two seconded to London, and exercises there in September 2026 at $30.00, a $200,000 spread. The US generally taxes the whole spread because she is a citizen, and the workday split makes roughly $100,000 of it foreign-source. The UK can tax that half through PAYE, where the shares are readily convertible assets, and through her own return where they are not, with a foreign tax credit and the US-UK treaty relieving the overlap.
An engineer at a US company's German subsidiary, a non-US citizen who has never lived or worked in the US, exercises options over 6,000 shares granted under the parent's US plan, at $4.00 when they are worth $19.00, a $90,000 spread. The US typically has no claim on it, since none of the work was done there, while Germany generally taxes the gain as employment income at progressive rates, withheld by the German subsidiary although the parent granted the option, with social security contributions also due.
A UK subsidiary employee receives unapproved options over 12,000 shares at $3.00 on a four-year vest, moves to the French subsidiary after one year, and exercises at $18.00 in France, a $180,000 spread. About $45,000 stays taxable in the UK after she has left and about $135,000 falls to France as salary in the exercise year, because no French qualified plan applied, with the UK-France treaty addressing any wider French claim.
Several favorable European regimes set company-level conditions before employee eligibility is even considered, so four decisions deserve a check before approval.
Slice Global is the AI-native global equity management and compliance platform, covering 67+ countries, with AI and compliance built into the workflow itself rather than bolted on afterward. With Slice, a French sub-plan, a relocation date, and the exercise notice German payroll needs to act on can all sit alongside the grant record, rather than in a spreadsheet nobody reopens until a return is due.
Across the six countries here, the taxing moment moved mainly on conditions settled at or before grant, such as a French sub-plan or an EMI or Section 19a size test, and on a sourcing day count that starts at grant.
Slice, the AI-native global equity management and compliance platform, keeps grants, relocations and tax estimates in one record across 67+ countries, with compliance alerts raised on the grants themselves. For the Seattle company, the Lyon engineer's tax year was largely decided on the day her grant was approved, which is when the French qualification conditions and the exercise notice's route to French payroll needed settling.
First calculate the exercise spread. Whether it is taxable at exercise depends on the option’s tax treatment and the countries involved.
For a broader breakdown of taxable events and calculations, see Slice's guide to employee stock option taxation.
Not automatically. The US company’s location alone does not determine the employee’s tax liability.
Companies should review the employment structure and local requirements before granting stock options to foreign employees.
Use work-location records to determine where option income was earned, then assess each country’s tax and payroll rules separately. Workday allocation commonly determines income sourcing; it does not necessarily divide the employee’s total tax bill.
Explore the operational implications in what happens to employee equity when employees move countries.
A coordinated process can reduce the risk of missed withholding by connecting exercise information, employee mobility history and the payroll teams responsible in each country.
Slice’s Equity Value Simulator lets finance teams model potential exercise outcomes by stakeholder, grant and tax treatment. Its results are estimates, not final payroll determinations.

News
Granting equity to EOR and payroll workers isn't standard HR paperwork. Join Slice and Papaya Global on Nov 18 to learn why handling and filings must happen at grant.


Global Equity Management
Recording a grant for a London or Berlin hire takes one screen. Knowing whether it can be made on those terms, and what it triggers later, is where global equity platforms split, and five of them are reviewed here on how much of that legal and tax work they carry.
