Europe

Empowering Polish Innovation: A Guide to Equity Grants in Poland's Thriving R&D Landscape

As Poland positions itself as a burgeoning hub for research and development, it is attracting a blend of emerging startups and established technology companies.

Gal Acrich

Global Equity Expert

7
 min read
July 11, 2024
Table of contents
Share This Article

Empowering Polish Innovation: A Guide to Equity Grants in Poland's Thriving R&D Landscape

As Poland positions itself as a burgeoning hub for research and development, it is attracting a blend of emerging startups and established technology companies. This growth is powered by Poland's strategic initiatives to enhance its R&D capabilities and a workforce known for its high educational standards and innovative mindset. Companies looking to leverage this potential are increasingly turning to equity grants as a means to attract, motivate, and retain top talent. This guide delves into the intricacies of navigating equity grant regulations in Poland, ensuring companies can effectively grant equity to their workforce while staying in full compliance.

The Appeal of Poland as an R&D Center

Poland’s commitment to becoming a leading R&D center in Europe is evident from its robust investment in tech infrastructure and favorable government policies aimed at fostering innovation. The country's focus on improving technological education and its participation in international tech collaborations create an ideal environment for tech companies. As such, understanding local equity grants is essential for companies aiming to establish a competitive edge in this dynamic market.

Differences Between Qualified and Non-Qualified Stock Options in Poland

Qualified Stock Options

Qualified stock options in Poland are a preferred choice for many employers due to their tax efficiency. The primary advantage is the deferral of the tax event until the sale of the shares, coupled with a fixed tax rate of 19%. 

Non-Qualified Stock Options

Conversely, non-qualified stock options are taxed upon exercise, with rates depending on the income bracket of the recipient—either 12% or 32%. An additional tax event occurs upon the sale of shares, leading to higher cumulative taxation. 

Key Requirements for Qualified Options

Grantee Requirements

  1. Employee Classification: Individuals officially recognized as employees are eligible to receive qualified options. This excludes EOR employees.
  2. Board Members and Remuneration: Board members who receive equity as part of their compensation, in addition to other forms of remuneration from the company or its group, are eligible for qualified options.
  3. Individual Contractors: Individual contractors, as opposed to B2B contractors, are also eligible to participate in qualified option schemes. 

Understanding B2B Contractors

A critical aspect of the Polish model is the exclusion of B2B contractors from the qualified option scheme. B2B contractors who operate under business-to-business contracts through their own registered business entities are excluded due to their distinct business status, which complicates compliance with equity compensation tax benefit regulations. It is important to understand the following aspects regarding B2B contractors:

  • General Considerations: B2B contracting is the dominant and most common form of contractor engagement in Poland, offering administrative simplicity for international companies or those with limited presence in the country. While engaging B2B contractors provides streamlined operational advantages, they are not eligible to receive options under the Qualified regime. It is important to note that altering their status to include them in qualified equity plans can be impractical and legally complex. Such a change often requires extensive restructuring that may not be feasible or desirable for all parties involved.
  • Registration and Identification: B2B contractors are required to register as sole entrepreneurs and possess a REGON number, which serves as a primary identifier for their business operations. This registration facilitates formal business activities and distinguishes them from typical employees.
  • Contractual Relationships: Contracts typically specify that the service provider is operating in a B2B capacity, using their business name and REGON number. This helps clarify the nature of the contractual relationship and the legal status of the contractor.
  • Tax and Compliance Implications: While the initial granting of options to B2B contractors does not trigger a tax event, exercising these options gives rise to a tax event, unlike the qualified tax treatment that defers taxation to the sale of shares. Upon exercise, a tax event occurs at rates of either 12% or 32%, depending on the contractor's income level. Additionally, there are other taxation alternatives for B2B contractors upon exercise: a 19% flat rate or a 3%-17% rate without cost deduction. As entrepreneurs, B2B contractors are subject to distinct tax regulations, adding layers of complexity to the equity compensation model.

Company Requirements

  1. Equity Plan Adoption and Approval: The company’s shareholders must approve the equity incentive plan, which does not need to be tailored specifically to Poland.
  2. Corporate Ownership and Structure: The grantor must be a Polish joint-stock company or a non-Polish standard corporation, with majority ownership in the Polish employing entity, ensuring control over the equity plan’s execution.
  3. Cross-Border Provisions: A double tax treaty must exist between the grantor's country and Poland, or the grantor must be based in or managed from an EU Member State.

Grant Requirements

Real Shares Requirement: To qualify, the plan must involve the issuance of actual shares, ensuring substantive equity participation by employees. For example, phantom shares may not qualify for the qualified regime.

Comparative Analysis

When exploring equity grant frameworks globally, Poland’s qualified regime exhibits noteworthy parallels and contrasts with well-known schemes such as Sweden’s Qualified Employee Stock Options (QESO), the UK’s various equity qualified regimes (EMI and CSOP), Israel’s Section 102 Capital Gain, and others. A key similarity across these regimes is that the tax event is deferred until the sale of the shares. Each model is tailored to maximize tax benefits and promote equity ownership among employees, making them attractive tools for companies aiming to incentivize and retain top talent.

Complexity of UK’s Qualified Plan Requirements

In the UK, qualifying for tax-advantaged treatment under the Enterprise Management Incentive (EMI) involves stringent conditions for both the issuing company and the grantee. These requirements include asset limitations, where the company's gross assets must not exceed £30 million, and restrictions on certain types of business activities, among others. For the Company Share Option Plan (CSOP), the exercise price must be at or above the fair market value (FMV) of the shares at the time of grant. For both schemes, there are also detailed reporting requirements and submissions to the HMRC, making the process administratively burdensome.

Sweden’s QESO and Its Rigorous Standards

Modeled after the UK’s EMI, Sweden’s QESO also incorporates a long list of eligibility requirements, mirroring the complexity seen in the UK. While offering significant tax benefits compliance with these schemes require more effort and resources from companies.

Similarity to Israel’s Section 102 Capital Gains

Israel's Section 102 Capital Gains regime also requires careful adherence to specific conditions to achieve tax advantages, such as a holding period of 2 years in trust and various eligibility criteria for companies and employees. 

Simplicity of Poland’s Qualified Options

Contrastingly, Poland’s approach to qualified stock options is markedly simpler and less burdensome. The eligibility criteria are less restrictive, and the administrative process is streamlined compared to the exhaustive requirements seen in the UK, Sweden, and Israel. This ease of implementation allows companies in Poland to efficiently incentivize their employees without the hefty compliance overhead associated with similar schemes in other jurisdictions. Poland's straightforward model offers a competitive edge, particularly for multinational corporations operating across diverse regulatory landscapes. It provides a framework that is easier to manage and can be more quickly adapted to meet corporate goals, facilitating the alignment of global equity grant strategies while optimizing tax and regulatory compliance.

Conclusion: Harnessing Poland’s Innovation Through Simplified Equity Grants

As Poland cements its status as a key player in the global R&D arena, the strategic implementation of equity grants stands out as a pivotal tool for companies aiming to harness this momentum. The simplicity and efficacy of Poland’s qualified stock option scheme not only streamline the process of incentivizing and retaining top talent but also position companies to fully leverage Poland's dynamic growth and innovative potential.

Whether you are a startup eager to attract sharp minds or a multinational looking to stabilize your foothold, Poland’s straightforward equity options provide a robust framework to empower your team. With this strategic approach, companies can look forward to not just participating in Poland’s R&D expansion but actively driving it, building a future where business growth and employee prosperity are intrinsically linked.

The writer, Gal Acrich, is an accomplished lawyer and accountant specializing in technology and equity management. Gal currently leads Business Development & Compliance at Slice, a global equity compliance platform that ensures secure and efficient equity management worldwide.

In today's competitive tech landscape, attracting and retaining top talent across borders is crucial for startup success. For companies with a growing presence in Sweden, navigating the complexities of equity compensation can be a significant hurdle. This is where Qualified Employee Stock Options (QESOs) become critical. Although implementing QESOs involves navigating numerous requirements, the substantial tax advantages make them a highly rewarding solution for both companies and employees.

What are QESOs?

Qualified Employee Stock Options (QESOs) are a type of stock option specifically designed for companies with a Swedish presence to incentivize employees with equity in the company. The beauty of QESOs lies in their favorable tax treatment for both the company and the employee:

  • Employee Benefits: Employees enjoy tax-free grants and are only taxed on capital gains at upon sale, typically at a rate of 25%.
  • Company Benefits: Companies benefit from reduced social security contributions compared to traditional non-qualified stock options.

Difference Between QESOs and Non-Qualified Stock Options in Sweden

When considering stock options, it's essential to understand the differences between QESOs and non-qualified stock options in Sweden:

  • Tax Event: For non-qualified stock options, there is a tax event upon exercise. Employees are taxed at progresive tax rate ranging between 30%-55% on the difference between the market price and the exercise price at the time of exercise.
  • Withholding Obligation: Employers have a withholding obligation for non-qualified stock options. Employers must withhold the appropriate tax amount through salary in the month following the exercise.
  • Social Security Contributions: Non-qualified stock options include a social security contribution obligation at a rate of 31.42%.

Key Requirements for QESOs

To benefit from the generous tax rules associated with QESOs, several strict requirements must be met. Here are the ten essential criteria for companies, stock options, and option holders:

Qualifying Conditions for Companies

  1. Fewer than 150 employees.
  2. No more than SEK 280 million in net Sales or balance sheet total.
  3. The company’s operations must not be older than 10 years.
  4. The company must not primarily engage in asset management, banking, financing, insurance, coal or steel production, real estate trading, long-term rental, or services related to legal advice, accounting, or auditing (“excluded activities”) for 3 consecutive years before the grant.
  5. Company must not be traded on a public stock market.
  6. Company cannot be direcly or indirectly controlled by a governmental body.
  7. The company must not be in financial difficulties.
  8. Company cannot be purely a holding company, and must undertake trade operations

Qualifying Conditions for Employees

  1. Be an employee or board member of the granting company or any subsidiary.
  2. Work a minimum of 75% of their working hours for the granting company or any subsidiary.
  3. Must earn a minimum salary of 13 “income base amounts” during the vesting period of 3 years after the grant date. The income base amount in 2024 is SEK 76,200.
  4. Employee, together with closely related affiliates, cannot own more than 5% of the voting rights or share capital of the granting company.

Beyond QESOs: Comparative Analysis

If you're familiar with the UK's Enterprise Management Incentive (EMI) scheme, you'll find striking similarities between QESOs and EMIs. Both programs have similar conditions and are designed to optimize tax benefits and encourage employee ownership, making them highly attractive for startups and growing companies looking to incentivize their workforce.

However, there are key distinctions that set QESOs apart, providing unique advantages:

  • No Limit on Exercise Price: One of the most notable advantages of QESOs over EMIs is the absence of a cap on the exercise price. This means that employees can potentially benefit more from their options, as there are no restrictions on the price at which options can be exercised. This flexibility allows for greater potential for value creation, particularly in rapidly growing companies where share prices can increase significantly over time.
  • Enhanced Flexibility and Applicability: The absence of exercise price restrictions allows for more customized compensation packages, appealing to a broader range of businesses and making QESOs a more versatile option across various sectors and stages of development.

Slice's Approach to QESO Management

At Slice, we offer a comprehensive solution for managing QESOs for Swedish employees, ensuring a streamlined and efficient process from creation through sale. Here's how we can assist:

  • Value Alerts: We provide real-time alerts on the value of options upon grant, both for the company and the option holder. This ensures the company does not exceed the option value limitations. 
  • Exercise Period Management: Our platform tracks and manages exercise periods, ensuring timely notifications and helping option holders maximize their benefits within the allowed timeframe.
  • Scope of Work Conditions: We monitor and enforce the scope of work conditions, ensuring compliance with employment and work hour requirements for QESO This helps maintain eligibility for tax benefits and other advantages.
  • Relationship Management: Whether the option holder is an employee, board member, or has another type of relationship with the company, we ensure all relevant criteria and conditions are met and tracked accurately.

With Slice, managing QESOs becomes a seamless experience, allowing both companies and option holders to focus on growth and success.

Conclusion – Investing the Time to Grant QESOs in Sweden is Worth It!

Although granting QESOs in Sweden requires understanding the tax rules, company requirements, and employee conditions, the tax advantages it offers are significant. Investing time in implementing and managing QESOs is a worthwhile endeavor, enhancing employee compensation and driving growth.

Global Equity Made Safe

CONTACT US
BACK TO BLOG
Further reading

Product

Building The World's Most Advanced Compliance Engine for Equity (Pt. II)

In this part of our blog posts series, we will explore the next phase of our journey: integrating this extensive compliance knowledge into a sophisticated rule-based compliance engine.

Amit Fogel

Head of Product Global Tax

8
 min read
August 1, 2024

News

Slice Renews SOC2 Type II and ISO 27001 Certifications!

We are proud to announce that we have renewed our SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications as part of our ongoing commitment to security and privacy.

Maor Levran

CEO

3
 min read
August 13, 2024

Europe

Unraveling the Complexities of Employee Stock Options in the UK

The United Kingdom stands out as a leader in the structuring and implementation of employee stock option schemes, showcasing a mature and well-developed approach that serves as a model for many other countries.

Gal Acrich

Global Equity Expert

10
 min read
June 13, 2024

Safeguard Your Equity Worldwide

Contact us